Enterprise imaging is the latest trend; however,
a well working solution can be challenging to implement. The most common challenge
is the differences in the various workflows. To implement an enterprise solution,
three methods can be used:
- A "top-down" approach - This model implements a vendor-neutral archive (VNA)
for radiology, cardiology, and several other departments, all pretty much
at the same time. The problem is that every department has a different
workflow. Some use the DICOM Modality Worklist, some use a HL7 feed, some
don’t use any prior order or worklist mechanism causing the images to be
reconciled with the patient information after the fact. As a matter of
fact, if you look at all of the different possible combinations, there are
more than 100 different scenarios as
described here. Using the top-down approach will set you up for chaos
if there are no well-defined workflow options and you let every department
decide on their “favorite” workflow.
- A "bottom-up"
approach - This model, which was used for
example at Stanford University Healthcare, implements a VNA beginning with
one department, and then adds other departments using the same workflow.
This solution results in an initial struggle to adapt everyone to the same
workflow but as soon as people start to see the results, everyone will get
excited and be ready to tackle the next one. As of today, Stanford has
several departments on-line, but everyone uses the same workflow. Interestingly
enough, radiology was not the first department they started with. Also
note that this is a multi-year process, which will take longer than the
top-down approach.
- A hybrid approach - This method, which was adopted for example at the
Mayo Clinic, is a combination of both approaches as it might not be
feasible to have everyone using exactly the same workflow. In this
particular institution they have identified five distinct workflows and
all of the new departments pick from these five options. These options
include the traditional order-based workflow, in their case driven by their
EMR, the non-order-based workflow using Patient ID look-up for
demographics and creating an EMR order after the fact, DICOM wrapping of
JPEG’s and a couple of variants.
Therefore, to implement enterprise imaging,
don’t go for the top-down approach as it can be chaotic, as each department
uses a different workflow, but rather, develop a handful of workflows (preferably
3 but no more than 5) and steer the departments to these options. The options will
be different for most institutions as each one has a different IT
infrastructure and different access to patient order and encounter information.
Before starting your implementation, develop these workflow options and spend
time testing them to see how they work, and if they do, stick with these, even though
it will require that users to change their behavior. As soon as they see the
benefits, it will be successful.
For a video version of this presentation,
including some thoughts on recent developments in PACS technology, see the live
interview here.